We study the problem of designing mechanisms when agents' valuation functions are drawn from unknown and correlated prior distributions. In particular, we are given a prior distribution $D$, and we are interested in designing a (truthful) mechanism that has good performance for all true distributions that are close to $D$ in Total Variation (TV) distance. We show that DSIC and BIC mechanisms in this setting are strongly robust with respect to TV distance, for any bounded objective function $\mathcal{O}$, extending a recent result of Brustle et al. ([BCD20], EC 2020). At the heart of our result is a fundamental duality property of total variation distance. As direct applications of our result, we (i) demonstrate how to find approximately revenue-optimal and approximately BIC mechanisms for weakly dependent prior distributions; (ii) show how to find correlation-robust mechanisms when only ``noisy'' versions of marginals are accessible, extending recent results of Bei et.

We study the problem of designing mechanisms when agents' valuation functions are drawn from unknown and correlated prior distributions. In particular, we are given a prior distribution D, and we are interested in designing a (truthful) mechanism that has good performance for all "true distributions" that are close to D in Total Variation (TV) distance. We show that DSIC and BIC mechanisms in this setting are strongly robust with respect to TV distance, for any bounded objective function \mathcal{O}, extending a recent result of Brustle et al. ([BCD20], EC 2020). At the heart of our result is a fundamental duality property of total variation distance. As direct applications of our result, we (i) demonstrate how to find approximately revenue-optimal and approximately BIC mechanisms for weakly dependent prior distributions; (ii) show how to find correlation-robust mechanisms when only noisy'' versions of marginals are accessible, extending recent results of Bei et.

While many classical notions of learnability (e.g., PAC learnability) are distribution-free, utilizing the specific structures of an input distribution may improve learning performance. For example, a product distribution on a multi-dimensional input space has a much simpler structure than a correlated distribution. A recent paper [GHTZ21] shows that the sample complexity of a general learning problem on product distributions is polynomial in the input dimension, which is exponentially smaller than that on correlated distributions. However, the learning algorithm they use is not the standard Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) algorithm. In this note, we characterize the sample complexity of ERM in a general learning problem on product distributions. We show that, even though product distributions are simpler than correlated distributions, ERM still needs an exponential number of samples to learn on product distributions, instead of a polynomial. This leads to the conclusion that a product distribution by itself does not make a learning problem easier -- an algorithm designed specifically for product distributions is needed.